<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Innovative Technology Weblog &#187; Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buit.org/category/vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buit.org</link>
	<description>Innovative Technology presented by Innovative People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows performance matters!</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2011/11/28/windows-performance-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2011/11/28/windows-performance-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PSlijkhuis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows; performance; WPA; logon; login;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2011/11/28/windows-performance-matters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 is often initiated for its performance like XP and unlike Vista. Too often the actual performance is measured by hand. By stopwatch! Please stop doing this and start reading this inventive blog post. Microsoft provides a free tool to measure the performance automatically. An improved toolkit is coming with Windows 8. For now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="ExternalClass32E4DFD887D54E1089F7DE6C0BBCA08F">
<p>Windows 7 is often initiated for its performance like XP and unlike Vista. Too often the actual performance is measured by hand. By stopwatch! Please stop doing this and start reading this inventive blog post.</p>
<p>Microsoft provides a free tool to measure the performance automatically. An improved toolkit is coming with Windows 8. For now we can perfectly live with the current toolkit. Let’s get started.&#160;&#160; </p>
<p>In this post I will explain how easy it can be to measure the performance of any Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2 system. I will also provide some practical advice how to create a report that adds value. </p>
<p>Note: Because of the Prefetch feature of Windows 7 it is highly recommended to prepare your test machine (referred to as ‘prepsystem’).</p>
<h2>Start measuring</h2>
<p>Your system needs to have installed:&#160; </p>
<ul>
<li>Windows Vista or higher (Windows XP does work but shows fewer results). Server system 2008 or higher. </li>
<li>.NET framework 4 </li>
<li>Local admin priveliges </li>
</ul>
<p>Now start with installing the magic tooling:</p>
<ul>
<li>Download the <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/nl-nl/library/ff190927" target="_blank">WPA toolkit</a> </li>
<li>Install ‘xbootmgr’ and ‘xperf’ (x86 or x64) </li>
<li>Create a temporary folder (c:\temp) </li>
<li>Open a CMD with admin priveliges </li>
</ul>
<p>Copy and past the following line in the CMD window:</p>
<p><em>xbootmgr -trace boot -traceFlags DiagEasy -resultPath C:\TEMP -numruns 10 rebootCycle –prepSystem</em></p>
<p>This will happen: </p>
<ul>
<li>Perform a trace for the time the pc boots (-trace boot) </li>
<li>Specificy the info details measured (-traceflags –diageasy) </li>
<li>Copy the results to ‘c:\temp’ (the .elt files) </li>
<li>Do this 10 times (reboot will go automatic, login by hand unless you specify / a number of 10 is a best practice average) </li>
<li>(option) Prepare yout test system 6x (2 times 3 with a break)&#160; </li>
</ul>
<h2>&#160;</h2>
<h2>Create results</h2>
<p>Create a XML summary file: </p>
<ul>
<li>For every .ETL file run this command: </li>
</ul>
<p><em>xperf /tti -i c:\temp\<strong>YourFile</strong>.etl -o summary_boot.xml -a boot</em></p>
<p>Write down the values for 1) bootDoneViaExplorer, 2) bootDoneViaPostBoot and 3) </p>
<ol>
<li>PreSMSS </li>
<li>SMSSInit </li>
<li>WinlogonInit </li>
<li>ExplorerInit </li>
<li>PostExplorerPeriod </li>
<li>TraceTail </li>
</ol>
<p>All values in milliseconds, so x100 for seconds.</p>
<h2>Time to logon</h2>
<p>Now what is the measured value for the logon time? This is the sum of the values : WinLogonInit, ExplorerInit and PostExplorerPeriod. The value of bootDoneViaExplorer indicates the total startup time.</p>
<p>However, the value of WinloginInit start counting on the moment that the login screen is shown. Meaning that typing userID and password is measured too as part of logon. This is why autologon is preferrred. On a domain joined machine this can be automated too (just Google)</p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<ul>
<li>Install the WPA toolkit on your Windows 7 test machine </li>
<li>Run a performance test and create a report </li>
<li>Give me some results! </li>
</ul>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>This post is inspired on the following websites: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/140247-trace-windows-7-bootshutdownhibernatestandbyresume-issuess">http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/140247-trace-windows-7-bootshutdownhibernatestandbyresume-issues</a> (generic guide)</p>
<p><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ff191001(v=vs.85).aspx">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ff191001(v=vs.85).aspx</a> (xbootmgr)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.computerperformance.co.uk/windows7/windows7_auto_logon.htm">http://www.computerperformance.co.uk/windows7/windows7_auto_logon.htm</a> (autologon)</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2011/11/28/windows-performance-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Power of Group Policy Preferences</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/05/27/the-power-of-group-policy-preferences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/05/27/the-power-of-group-policy-preferences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Luppes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2008/05/27/the-power-of-group-policy-preferences/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month me and some collegues went to MMS2008 in Las Vegas were I saw a cool demo of Group Police Preferences. The name Group Policy Preferences did ring a bell with me and suddenly I remembered. A few weeks before MMS I saw a Windows Update that was called Group Policy Preferences Client Side [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La<a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/windowslivewriterthepowerofgrouppolicypreferences-d673snag-0005-2.png" rel="lightbox[380]"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="244" alt="SNAG-0005" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/windowslivewriterthepowerofgrouppolicypreferences-d673snag-0005-thumb.png" width="95" align="left" border="0"></a>st month me and some collegues went to MMS2008 in Las Vegas were I saw a cool demo of Group Police Preferences. The name Group Policy Preferences did ring a bell with me and suddenly I remembered. A few weeks before MMS I saw a Windows Update that was called Group Policy Preferences Client Side Extensions, but I did&#8217;nt know what it was.</p>
<p>So now that I&#8217;m a few weeks back home I finaly had some time to play with it on my Demo Domain that I setup last week using <a href="http://www.buit.org/2008/05/19/windows-server-2008-core-for-the-lazy-admin/" target="_blank">CoreConfigurator</a>. To use Group Policy Preferences you must have a few things in place:</p>
<ul>
<ul>
<ul>
<ul>
<ul>
<ul>
<li>A Windows Server 2008 or Windows Vista SP1 machine (only needed for managing Group Policy Preferences) </li>
</ul>
<li>RSAT Installed on the management machine
<li>Deployed the Group Policy Preferences Client Side Extensions to your Desktops/Servers (XP SP2 or higher)
<li>Active Directory</li>
</ul>
</ul>
</ul>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>Note : You don&#8217;t need a 2008 DC or Windows Vista SP1 client to use Group Policy Preferences !!</p>
<p>On the left screenshot you can see all the different options that can be managed using Group Policy Preferences. There ar too much settings to show them all on this blog, but I realy like to show you some nice things. I made some screenshots of some common things you normaly do in loginscripts or kix scripts, but that are now possible in Group Policy. (click on the images to see it full size)<a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/windowslivewriterthepowerofgrouppolicypreferences-d673snag-0011-2.png" rel="lightbox[380]"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="244" alt="SNAG-0011" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/windowslivewriterthepowerofgrouppolicypreferences-d673snag-0011-thumb.png" width="74" align="right" border="0"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/windowslivewriterthepowerofgrouppolicypreferences-d673snag-0006-2.png" rel="lightbox[380]"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="124" alt="SNAG-0006" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/windowslivewriterthepowerofgrouppolicypreferences-d673snag-0006-thumb.png" width="112" align="left" border="0"></a> </p>
<p>With Group Policy Preferences it is easy to map networkdrives. Not only you can map a drive for all users in a generic user policy, but it is also&nbsp; possible to target this mapping to no more then 27 targeting rules. (Image on the right)</p>
<p>Most common is to map a network share based on group membership or IP subnet. This way way it is possible to map a share witf for example application data to a server that is on the same geographical location as the user without the need of using DFS or site loginscripts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/windowslivewriterthepowerofgrouppolicypreferences-d673snag-0010-2.png" rel="lightbox[380]"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="124" alt="SNAG-0010" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/windowslivewriterthepowerofgrouppolicypreferences-d673snag-0010-thumb.png" width="112" align="left" border="0"></a>An other example is setting up how users (or administrators) see their files in Windows Explorer. In this screenshot I set it up so that the user will see the file extentions for known files and also shows hidden &amp; system files, this is a setting that most admins will set if they logon to a new machine. This is also the power of Group Policy Preferences, the most settings an administrator will have to manualy do if he is building a new image for deployment can be managed by Group Policy Preferences.</p>
<p>As you can imagine there are hundreds or maybe thousends of possibilities that you use in solving those anoying problems you usely have to solve using scripts or other tools.</p>
<p>Next thing I have to do is migrating my loginscript at home to Group Policy Preferences.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Have fun with it.</p>
<p>Erik Luppes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/05/27/the-power-of-group-policy-preferences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Linux will not displace Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/02/06/why-linux-will-not-displace-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/02/06/why-linux-will-not-displace-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wiebe Niehof</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2008/02/06/why-linux-will-not-displace-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this post on ZDNET and it totally convinced me!  =========================== &#8220;You are kidding arent you ? Are you saying that this linux can run on a computer without windows underneath it, at all ? As in, without a boot disk, without any drivers, and without any services ?That sounds preposterous to me. If it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dt>I found this post on ZDNET and it totally convinced me!<strong> </strong></dt>
<p><strong>===========================</strong></p>
<p><strong><em>&#8220;You are kidding arent you ? </em></strong></p>
<p><em>Are you saying that this linux can run on a computer without windows underneath it, at all ? As in, without a boot disk, without any drivers, and without any services ?</em><em>That sounds preposterous to me.</p>
<p>If it were true (and I doubt it), then companies would be selling computers without a windows. This clearly is not happening, so there must be some error in your calculations. I hope you realise that windows is more than just Office ? Its a whole system that runs the computer from start to finish, and that is a very difficult thing to acheive. A lot of people dont realise this.</p>
<p>Microsoft just spent $9 billion and many years to create Vista, so it does not sound reasonable that some new alternative could just snap into existence overnight like that. It would take billions of dollars and a massive effort to achieve. IBM tried, and spent a huge amount of money developing OS/2 but could never keep up with Windows. Apple tried to create their own system for years, but finally gave up recently and moved to Intel and Microsoft.</p>
<p>Its just not possible that a freeware like the Linux could be extended to the point where it runs the entire computer fron start to finish, without using some of the more critical parts of windows. Not possible.</p>
<p>I think you need to re-examine your assumptions. &#8221;</p>
<p></em><a href="http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12355-0.html?forumID=1&amp;threadID=31199&amp;messageID=579806&amp;start=-9530">http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12355-0.html?forumID=1&amp;threadID=31199&amp;messageID=579806&amp;start=-9530</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/02/06/why-linux-will-not-displace-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Releases Windows DreamScene (Final)</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2007/09/25/microsoft-releases-windows-dreamscene-final/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2007/09/25/microsoft-releases-windows-dreamscene-final/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Luppes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2007/09/25/microsoft-releases-windows-dreamscene-final/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Microsoft has resleased Windows Dreamscene to all Windows Ultimate customers. To install Dreamscene simply run Windows Update. As most of you already know, Windows DreamScene transforms your desktop from a static wallpaper image into a full-motion video. In conjunction with Stardock, weâ€™re pleased to also offer a number of cool, new animated DreamScene desktops, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Microsoft has resleased Windows Dreamscene to all Windows Ultimate customers. To install Dreamscene simply run Windows Update.</p>
<p>As most of you already know, Windows DreamScene transforms your desktop from a static wallpaper image into a full-motion video. In conjunction with Stardock, weâ€™re pleased to also offer a number of cool, new animated DreamScene desktops, including â€œAuroraâ€?. Additionally, you can use your own videos as DreamScene desktops or visit Stardockâ€™s Dream.WinCustomize.com website to download Stardockâ€™s DeskScapes (an add-on to DreamScene) as well as a collection of fabulous content created by Stardock and members of the Ultimate community. </p>
<p>More @ <a href="http://windowsultimate.com/blogs/announcements/archive/2007/09/25/windows-dreamscene-released.aspx">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2007/09/25/microsoft-releases-windows-dreamscene-final/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WinHelp for Windows Vista!</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2007/03/13/winhelp-for-windows-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2007/03/13/winhelp-for-windows-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marco Nielsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2007/03/13/winhelp-for-windows-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft decided not to include a copy of the old WinHlp.exe in the Windows Vista RTM and wanted some time to update/redo it for security reasons.Â Â Not a bad idea.. See the breif Â http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917607Â article for more information. But it appears that the updating work is over and it is now available for all those older .HLP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft decided not to include a copy of the old WinHlp.exe in the Windows Vista RTM and wanted some time to update/redo it for security reasons.Â Â Not a bad idea..</p>
<p>See the breif Â <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917607">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917607</a>Â article for more information.</p>
<p>But it appears that the updating work is over and it is now available for all those older .HLP files you can&#8217;t open on Vista unless you copy over your old Windows XP version.. <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Download it here:<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=6ebcfad9-d3f5-4365-8070-334cd175d4bb">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=6ebcfad9-d3f5-4365-8070-334cd175d4bb</a></p>
<p>|\\arco..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2007/03/13/winhelp-for-windows-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista SP1 &#8211; Hotfix Preview</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2007/03/06/windows-vista-sp1-hotfix-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2007/03/06/windows-vista-sp1-hotfix-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marco Nielsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2007/03/06/windows-vista-sp1-hotfix-preview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found this interesting list of possible hotfixes thatÂ could be included in the upcoming SP1. http://vistasp1.net/ Also makes a good list of patches to try out if you run into issues or strange behavior. &#124;\\arco..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found this interesting list of possible hotfixes thatÂ could be included in the upcoming SP1.<br />
<a href="http://vistasp1.net/">http://vistasp1.net/</a></p>
<p>Also makes a good list of patches to try out if you run into issues or strange behavior. <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>|\\arco..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2007/03/06/windows-vista-sp1-hotfix-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Charity @ Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/27/no-charity-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/27/no-charity-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wiebe Niehof</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2007/02/27/no-charity-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of fuss about Microsoft&#8217;s virtualization licensing and distribution policies. The biggest player in this market (and properbly the most affected), VMware, is pissedÂ andÂ posted a whitepaper with their 7 complaints. Â VMware seven objections are: 1) Microsoft offers top virtualization support for only premier-level support customers, inherently limiting the ability for many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of fuss about Microsoft&#8217;s virtualization licensing and distribution policies. The biggest player in this market (and properbly the most affected), VMware, is pissedÂ andÂ posted a <a href="http://www.vmware.com/solutions/whitepapers/msoft_licensing_wp.html" title="whitepaper">whitepaper</a> with their 7 complaints.</p>
<p><font size="2"><br />
Â <strong>VMware seven objections are:</strong><br />
<strong>1)</strong> Microsoft offers top virtualization support for only premier-level support customers, inherently limiting the ability for many customers to get technical support for competitive virtualization platforms;</font><font size="2"><strong>2)</strong>Â Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;restrictive terms&#8221; on the use of published virtual machines, or appliances, is unfair to users. Microsoft, VMware claims, restricts use of VHD formatted virtual machines to Microsoft Virtual Server and Virtual PC only;</p>
<p><strong>3)</strong> Microsoft restricts customer choice by configuring its VHD virtual machines to de-activate if they are run on any virtualization offering other than Virtual PC or Virtual Server;</p>
<p><strong>4)</strong>Â Microsoft&#8217;s VHD licensing agreement prevents users from converting the VHD format into any virtual machine format, thus preventing compatibility with competitive platform and preventing translations into VMware&#8217;s formats;</p>
<p><strong>5)</strong>Â Microsoft&#8217;s licensing policies discriminate against use of VMware&#8217;s Vmotion and other virtualization management platforms that enable users to move virtual machines from one platform to another. VMware cites one policy that requires &#8220;permanent assignment&#8221; of operating system licenses to specific systems and simultaneously restricts the movement of those operating system licenses. VMware claims that one policy, for example, is designed to restrict movement of Windows server licenses more than once every quarter.</p>
<p><strong>6)</strong>Â Microsoft imposes significant restrictions on desktop virtualization including the movement of desktop virtual machines, restrictions on OEM versions of Windows, and restrictions on virtualization on Windows Vista. VMware charges that this makes it difficult if not impossible for end users to choose competitive platforms. VMware attempts to back its case by pointing out that VMware once had an OEM license to redistribute Windows in a VMware VM but has not been able to renew that since 2003.</p>
<p><strong>7)</strong>Â Finally, VMware claims that Microsoft&#8217;s virtualization APIs for Longhorn are proprietary. The APIs handle communication between Windows and the Microsoft hypervisor. VMware said Microsoft opened up three virtualization APIs last June but they cannot be used by virtualization vendors.</p>
<p></font>Does this mean we can put virtualization in the same category as the browser and the mediaplayer?&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/27/no-charity-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista Dreamscene available.</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/14/windows-vista-dreamscene-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/14/windows-vista-dreamscene-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Luppes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2007/02/14/windows-vista-dreamscene-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last evening i noticed that there was an Windows Ultimate Update available, so i said to my self lets check it out. What was the updatescreen telling me ?? Sorry for the Dutch but it&#8217;s saying that there is 1 Ultimate Extra available. For those that allready missed what I am talking about, DreamScene gives [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last evening i noticed that there was an Windows Ultimate Update available, so i said to my self lets check it out.</p>
<p>What was the updatescreen telling me ??<br />
<a href='http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/dreamscene.JPG' title='Dreamscene Update' rel="lightbox[144]"><img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/dreamscene.JPG' alt='Dreamscene Update' /></a><br />
Sorry for the Dutch <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  but it&#8217;s saying that there is 1 Ultimate Extra available.</p>
<p>For those that allready missed what I am talking about, DreamScene gives the user to put a movie as a wallpaper. For example a watterfall scene of 5 seconds and then looped so it looks like the water keeps on flowing. Windows Vista has the abbility to do this with allmost no use of resources.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using the x64 of Windows Vista Ultimate, and i know Microsoft released 2 different versions of Dreamscene, a 32-bit and a 64-bit, my guess is that both are on Windows Update tonight.</p>
<p>The download is 21Mb in size and does need a reboot to get active.</p>
<p>Have Fun out there <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Grtz Erik</p>
<p>P.S. Want to se aa little demo of DreamScene ? Look at this short YouTube video:<br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xhWsY7u87Cs"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xhWsY7u87Cs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/14/windows-vista-dreamscene-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KMS for Windows Server 2003 released</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/13/kms-for-windows-server-2003-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/13/kms-for-windows-server-2003-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marco Nielsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2007/02/13/kms-for-windows-server-2003-released/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Key Management Service for Windows Server 2003 is part of Microsoft Windows Volume Activation 2.0. It allows enterprise users to host Key Management Service on Windows Server 2003 to enable activation of Windows Vista using Key Management Service (KMS) Key. KMS based activation allows enterprise customers to host a local service within their environment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name="Description"></a><font size="2">Microsoft Key Management Service for Windows Server 2003 is part of Microsoft Windows Volume Activation 2.0. It allows enterprise users to host Key Management Service on Windows Server 2003 to enable activation of Windows Vista using Key Management Service (KMS) Key.</p>
<p>KMS based activation allows enterprise customers to host a local service within their environment to enable activation of machines running Windows Vista Business and Windows Vista Enterprise editions within their environment instead of any activation against Microsoft. Machines that have been activated through KMS will be required to reactivate by connecting to the KMS host at least once every 6 months.</p>
<p>Key Management Service for Windows Server 2003 enables deployment of Windows Vista using current and released server operating system. It uses the Windows Vista KMS key provided through Microsoftâ€™s Volume Licensing System portals (MVLS, eOpen). The KMS host can be activated using either online or offline methods. It uses the same interfaces and tools as KMS on Windows Vista including:<br />
â€¢ Software Licensing API, WMI interfaces, error codes, logging events<br />
â€¢ SLMGR.VBS and KMS Management Pack for Microsoft Operations Manager</font></p>
<p>Download here:<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=81d1cb89-13bd-4250-b624-2f8c57a1ae7b&amp;DisplayLang=en" title="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=81d1cb89-13bd-4250-b624-2f8c57a1ae7b&amp;DisplayLang=en"><font color="#800080">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=81d1cb89-13bd-4250-b624-2f8c57a1ae7b&amp;DisplayLang=en</font></a></p>
<p>|\\arco..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/13/kms-for-windows-server-2003-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BitLocker Drive Preparation Tool Now Available</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/10/131/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/10/131/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marco Nielsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2007/02/10/131/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those involved with Vista deployments and looking at using BitLocker with BDD/LiteTouch you probably need to look at the updated BDEHDCFG.EXE tool: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=930063 It basically provides a way to automatically resize your existingÂ partition and add a new partitionÂ forÂ BitLocker and make it the active partition, called a &#8220;split-load&#8221; configuration.Â  Part of the Windows Vista Ulimate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those involved with Vista deployments and looking at using BitLocker with BDD/LiteTouch you probably need to look at the updated BDEHDCFG.EXE tool:<br />
<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/?id=930063">http://support.microsoft.com/?id=930063</a></p>
<p>It basically provides a way to automatically resize your existingÂ partition and add a new partitionÂ forÂ BitLocker and make it the active partition, called a &#8220;split-load&#8221; configuration.Â </p>
<p>Part of the Windows Vista Ulimate Extras as well:<br />
<a href="http://windowsultimate.com/blogs/extras/archive/2007/01/07/bitlocker-and-efs-enhancements.aspx">http://windowsultimate.com/blogs/extras/archive/2007/01/07/bitlocker-and-efs-enhancements.aspx</a></p>
<p>|\\arco..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2007/02/10/131/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

