<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Innovative Technology Weblog &#187; Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buit.org/category/virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buit.org</link>
	<description>Innovative Technology presented by Innovative People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VMWare ThinApp now able to virtualize MS Groove</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2009/07/05/vmware-thinapp-now-able-to-virtualize-ms-groove/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2009/07/05/vmware-thinapp-now-able-to-virtualize-ms-groove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elger van der Avoird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Groove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an experiment in cooperation with some collegues @ VMWare and CAPGemini we developed a virtualized, portable MS Groove environment that can be started from a USB device. We had to call in support from VMWare because ThinApp wouldn&#8217;t start Groove. After making a bug report VMWare took it up seriously and supplied me with a version that does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an experiment in cooperation with some collegues @ VMWare and CAPGemini we developed a virtualized, portable MS Groove environment that can be started from a USB device. We had to call in support from VMWare because ThinApp wouldn&#8217;t start Groove. After making a bug report VMWare took it up seriously and supplied me with a version that does work! We are definately moving forward here; Groove without any additional infrastructural needs or traditional installation, running without administrative credentials and from a portable device is now very real. (will it work on Windows 7? More work to be done&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2009/07/05/vmware-thinapp-now-able-to-virtualize-ms-groove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selecting Virtualization Candidates with SCOM 2007 R2</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2009/06/11/selecting-virtualization-candidates-with-scom-2007-r2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2009/06/11/selecting-virtualization-candidates-with-scom-2007-r2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Eikenboom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operations Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpsMgr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOM 2007 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2009/06/11/selecting-virtualization-candidates-with-scom-2007-r2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OpsMgr is mainly used to get a grip on you server infrastructure and to optimize performance and availability by using best practice, which knowledge provide in the MP’s, and resolve errors with a head start with the provided knowledge. But the next step into monitoring is getting the most out of your infrastructure and Virtualization [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpsMgr is mainly used to get a grip on you server infrastructure and to optimize performance and availability by using best practice, which knowledge provide in the MP’s, and resolve errors with a head start with the provided knowledge. But the next step into monitoring is getting the most out of your infrastructure and Virtualization is one of these things that can help you get there.</p>
<p>Currently a lot of organizations want to save money and cut back on hardware and power with the great green IT wave landing in most organizations right now. OpsMgr can help you that. VMM 2008 has the ability to manage and optimize performance, load and availability and cut back on the off hour work by leveraging the heterogenic environment to a single management console in combination with PRO ( <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/virtualmachinemanager/en/us/whats-new.aspx" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #2e8fc6;">Performance and Resource Optimization</span></strong></a> ) it does give you the insides and tips in your environment. So System Center Operations Manager and Virtual Machine Manager will give you the tools you need the manage it all.</p>
<p>But how can i select the best virtualization candidate in my environment to make the first steps in optimizing my infrastructure? The answer is easier than expected.</p>
<p>To select the best virtualization candidates just import the<strong> </strong><em>System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2008</em> and the <em><strong>System Center Virtualization Reports 2008</strong></em> Management pack from the catalog to run the report for virtualization candidate selection, <strong>even</strong> when you not using VMM 2008 in your environment.</p>
<p>This MP is not only for the SCOM 2007 R2 users but can be used in SCOM 2007 SP1 too. Just download the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=d6d5cddd-4ec8-4e3c-8ab1-102ec99c257f&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #2e8fc6;">System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2008 Management Pack for System Center Operations Manager 2007</span></strong></a> and import the Microsoft.SystemCenter.VirtualMachineManager.2008.mp and the Microsoft.Virtualization.Reports.2008.mp and you can run your reports.</p>
<p>Getting into the report go, in the SCOM console, to the reporting area and navigate to the System <em>Center Virtualization reports 2008</em>  and select the <em><strong>Virtualization Candidates</strong></em> report. Now you can define the parameters for you selection of virtualization candidates.</p>
<p><a href="/Users/weikenboom/AppData/Local/Temp/WindowsLiveWriter1286139640/supfiles5C0A9C/image[11].png" rel="lightbox[508]"></a></p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="https://1b0wva.blu.livefilestore.com/y1mxOrpE05gey01iRkjubRVGyeSnswh1N2GASqfZ5S2JparQOuVY6yrrsWcsRkAADNEy6ZX_IqFIAFETZc3wh0YBdZhSS_c84yuvM89fUbW1n2QzEsIauY8BPM-Ao1KBhQQa_p4SewAp-5u75JmZckg3w/image[11].png" alt="" width="614" height="351" /> </p>
<p>Start identifying you virtualization candidates and building your dynamic datacenter, have fun with it!</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> The selection process for virtual candidates relays on the “Virtual machine” property “IsVirtualMachine” to be FALSE for selecting the physical machines in your environment. The downside to that property is that VMWare virtual machines are not detected so the generated reports will show the physical machines you want to see and the virtual VMWare machines.</p>
<p>The solution to that problem is the following Management pack made by Pete Zerger of the <a href="http://www.systemcentercentral.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #5f40a8;">System Center Central</span></a>. Thanks Pete!</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.systemcenterforum.org/downloads/virtual-machine-discovery-mp-for-opsmgr-2007/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #5f40a8;">Virtual Machine Discovery MP for OpsMgr 2007</span></a></strong></p>
<p>This MP extends existing discovery of virtual machines by Operations Manager and Essentials to include VMware guests. The MP will update the “IsVirtualMachine” property of the Windows Computer object to TRUE for VMware guests. Also disables and replaces the existing discovery rule that sets this value to false for non-MS VMs.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Walter Eikenboom<br />
<a href="http://weblogwally.spaces.live.com"><strong><span style="color: #2e8fc6;">http://weblogwally.spaces.live.com</span></strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2009/06/11/selecting-virtualization-candidates-with-scom-2007-r2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to integrate App-V with SCCM without losing the features you care about</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2009/02/13/how-to-integrate-app-v-with-sccm-without-losing-the-features-you-care-about/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2009/02/13/how-to-integrate-app-v-with-sccm-without-losing-the-features-you-care-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Reeuwijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Configuration Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCCM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2009/02/13/how-to-integrate-app-v-with-sccm-without-losing-the-features-you-care-about/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most anticipated features of SCCM 2007 R2 is &#8220;App-V Integration&#8221;. We have recently tested the end-to-end scenario for this integration and we can say with confidence: it BLOWS . In a nutshell, by integrating App-V with SCCM you lose App-V&#8217;s best features and reduce the solution to something that&#8217;s even worse than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most anticipated features of SCCM 2007 R2 is &#8220;App-V Integration&#8221;. We have recently tested the end-to-end scenario for this integration and we can say with confidence: it BLOWS <span style="Wingdings"> <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </span>. In a nutshell, by integrating App-V with SCCM you lose App-V&#8217;s best features and reduce the solution to something that&#8217;s even worse than SCCM by itself!</p>
<p>So what happens when you enable the App-V/SCCM integration feature in the SCCM Management Console?</p>
<ul>
<li>Control of the App-V client is seized by the SCCM client. If you had App-V running on its own before you enabled the integration, you&#8217;ll notice that all App-V apps that are published through App-V&#8217;s Publishing Server are now rendered invalid. On launch you&#8217;ll get a &#8220;Unable to initialize package information (0×00000000)&#8221; error.</li>
<li>You must now publish your App-V apps through SCCM as &#8220;Virtual Application Packages&#8221;. This works by importing the .XML file of the App-V package. SCCM will distribute the packages to its Distribution Points and you can enable those Distribution Points for HTTP(S) streaming.</li>
<li>To get the App-V apps to your clients, you&#8217;ll have to create SCCM advertisements. Basically SCCM advertisements replace the App-V Publishing Server. The behavior of getting App-V apps to your desktop now becomes eerily similar to SCCM&#8217;s way of installing applications. No more getting your shortcuts immediately upon logon (like you get with App-V); you will have to go get a cup of coffee and hope that SCCM is willing to give you your apps today.</li>
<li>If you created non-mandatory assignments, then you&#8217;ll have to go to Add/Remove Programs yourself and click &#8220;Run&#8221; for all the apps that you want. However clicking &#8220;Run&#8221; doesn&#8217;t actually run your app, it only registers the App-V app with the local App-V client. Don&#8217;t expect to see any progress bar or visual feedback that the registration actually happened; just keep scouring around in your Start Menu in hope of finding the shortcuts for your new app.</li>
<li>If you created mandatory assignments, you&#8217;ll get one or more notifications from SCCM (after some time ofcourse) that SCCM has App-V apps for you that it would like to register with the local App-V client. It will do that on *every* desktop you logon to. Prepare to spend quite a bit of quality time with the SCCM Client…</li>
<li>If you&#8217;re using either Windows Terminal Services or Fast User Switching in Vista, you&#8217;re SOL because the SCCM Client is allergic to terminal sessions. You&#8217;ll get a message telling you that &#8220;No programs are available to run from a Terminal Services session&#8221;. How nice. If you happen to be running the console session, you won&#8217;t notice this limitation because at the console session, everything works just fine. So make sure you also test your solution via a terminal session so you won&#8217;t get caught by surprise.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>As a result of the findings described above, we were pretty disappointed with the solution and decided to reverse our decision to integrate App-V with SCCM. However we did like the idea of using SCCM Distribution Points to stream App-V apps from. So we had a go at doing a manual integration of App-V with SCCM so that we could use just the SCCM parts we wanted. The idea was inspired by <a href="http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/timmangan/archive/2008/11/23/the-best-of-two-worlds-in-app-v.aspx">Tim Mangan&#8217;s article</a> which included this diagram:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/021309-1903-howtointegr1.png" alt="" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>In his article he never got around to actually testing if it was possible to stream an application that was published by App-V&#8217;s Publishing Server from an SCCM Distribution Point. He only verified that is was possible to install the App-V app through an MSI with SCCM. So we ventured to get HTTP streaming working against SCCM Distribution Points, with the shortcuts still being provided by an App-V Publishing Server. In a nutshell: it works! You do have to setup a few mechanisms to get load balancing working though.</p>
<p>Here is how it works:</p>
<ul>
<li>First and foremost: <span style="underline">disable</span> the App-V integration with SCCM. To do this, go to the <em>SCCM Console <span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span> Site Database <span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span> Site Management <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> &lt;Site&gt; <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Site Settings <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Client Agents <span style="Wingdings">-&gt; </span>Advertised Programs Client Agent <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Properties</em> and make sure &#8220;Allow virtual application package advertisement&#8221; is NOT selected.</li>
<li>Enable your SCCM Distribution Points for BITS, HTTP and HTTPS content transfer. To do this, go to the <em>SCCM Console <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Site Database <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Site Management <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> &lt;Site&gt; <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Site Settings <span style="Wingdings">-&gt; </span>Site Systems <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> &lt;your DP&gt; <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> ConfigMgr distribution point <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Properties</em> and select &#8220;Allow clients to transfer content from this distribution point using BITS, HTTP and HTTPS&#8221;.</li>
<li>We found that (at least in the RTM version of SCCM 2007 R2) you don&#8217;t have to enable &#8220;virtual application streaming&#8221; on the &#8220;Virtual Applications&#8221; tab of the distribution point to be able to stream from a SCCM DP when using our manual integration. The added benefit of this is that you can now also use Secondary Site DP&#8217;s as streaming servers!</li>
<li>Set up an App-V Management Server on any server you like. You can even set it up on a SCCM server, it doesn&#8217;t matter. Use the default installation settings for the entire installation. After installation, set the Default Content Path to the following: <em>http://%SFT_SOFTGRIDSERVER%</em></li>
<li>
<div>Add an App-V package to SCCM for distribution and streaming:</div>
<ul>
<li>Go to the <em>SCCM Console <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Site Database <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Computer Management <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Software Distribution <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Packages<span style="Wingdings"> <span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> New <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Package</em>. Enter the information about your package and click Next. Select &#8220;This package contains source files&#8221; and set the Source Directory to the location of your App-V package and click Finish. Note that you import the App-V package as a normal SCCM package and NOT as a Virtual Application Package. Importing it as a Virtual Application Package will cause the .SFT file in the App-V package to be renamed and cause the .SFT file to be added to not 1 but 2 locations on each SCCM Distribution Point, doubling storage requirements.</li>
<li>When the package is added to SCCM, find the Package ID and use it to update the streaming location in the App-V OSD files. For each OSD file in your App-V package, update the HREF statement to HTTP://%SFT_SOFTGRIDSERVER%/SMS_DP$/SMSPKG/&lt;<em>your SCCM Package ID</em>&gt;/&lt;<em>name of your SFT file</em>&gt;<br />
(If you are using a File Share Distribution Point, the IIS vdir may be different than SMS_DP$. Verify the vdir name in IIS Manager and ensure that all DP&#8217;s are either standard DP&#8217;s or File Share DP&#8217;s.)</li>
<li>Now add some SCCM Distribution Points to your package so that SCCM can distribute the App-V content</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<div>Import the same App-V package into the App-V Management Server so that you can distribute the shortcuts and set permissions:</div>
<ul>
<li>On the App-V Management Server, go to the App-V Management Console, go to <em>Applications</em><br />
<em><span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Import Application</em> and go to the same App-V package folder. Select the .SPRJ file and click Open. Perform your regular App-V import steps and finish the import.</li>
<li>The imported applications in the App-V Management Console should now show the correct http:// paths to both the OSD file(s) and the SFT file(s).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>That&#8217;s it! Now just configure your App-V Clients on the desktops to use your newly setup App-V Management Server by configuring a Publishing Server and use Group Policy to set the %SFT_SOFTGRIDSERVER% to the name of a SCCM Distribution Point nearby. We set this variable to DNS name that uses DNS Round Robin to distribute the load to multiple DP&#8217;s.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2009/02/13/how-to-integrate-app-v-with-sccm-without-losing-the-features-you-care-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware makes a strange move</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/12/14/vmware-makes-a-strange-move/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/12/14/vmware-makes-a-strange-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wiebe Niehof</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[      Every day the battle in the virtualization market is getting more exciting.  Thursday (11 December 2008) VMware released update 3 for it&#8217;s free hypervisor: ESXi. No big deal right?But apparently they changed something in this update that could really change the way VMware virtual infrastructures will look like in a few months / years.  In the last 12 months we have seen a change [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span>     </p>
<div>
<p>Every day the battle in the virtualization market is getting more exciting. </p>
<p>Thursday (11 December 2008) VMware released update 3 for it&#8217;s free hypervisor: ESXi. No big deal right?But <a href="http://www.virtualization.info/2008/12/vmware-esxi-gets-update-3-and-fully.html" target="_blank">apparently</a> they changed something in this update that could really change the way VMware virtual infrastructures will look like in a few months / years. </p>
<p>In the last 12 months we have seen a change of focus within the virtualization battle. The hypervisor has really become a commodity and is free (ESXi &amp; Hyper-V). It&#8217;s all about managing the virtual infrastructure now. Microsoft released their System Center Virtual Machine Manager (VMM) for this. What makes VMM great is that it can manage different virtual infrastructures at only a fraction of the cost of other managing tools. VMM can also manage a VMware VI. The downside of this is the fact that although you can manage a VMware environment you will also need VirtualCenter. VMM needs VirtualCenter to pass the command to the ESX servers. So you would need double the licenses for management software for your VI. Smart move from VMware, because they are actually making their money with the extra features that VirtualCenter brings.</p>
<p>But with update 3 of ESXi, VMware has decided to <span style="underline;">fully unlock all A<span style="underline;">PI&#8217;s</span>. This means that any virtual machine managing tool can perform Vmotion activities on a VMware VI. This really diminishes the need for VirtualCenter. VMM would be able to perform the most important management tasks. For medium sized environments this would definitly be enough. You will have a stable hypervisor for free (ESXi) and the management tools for nearly nothing (VMM). </span></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure VMware has thought about this as well and is convinced about the business case for VirtualCenter. I hope they or anyone else on this blog will share this soon with me.</p></div>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/images/crosshairs-vm.jpg" alt="" width="209" height="210" /></p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong></p>
<p>Well this explains everything. </p>
<p><em> &#8221;Turns out that while fixing an API bug the API set got partially unlocked. Yes, you read that right, VMware didn’t mean to unlock the API set &#8211; at least not wholly and not yet. So, if you went out and started madly coding some killer VirtualCenter Client replacement then hold off because I’m told the U4 update will lock things back down again&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Read all about it, on this blog: <a href="http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2008/12/update-vmware-rcli-now-writes-to-esxi-free-hosts.html">http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2008/12/update-vmware-rcli-now-writes-to-esxi-free-hosts.html</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/12/14/vmware-makes-a-strange-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware accidentally timebombs ESX, causing worldwide mayhem</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/08/12/vmware-accidentally-timebombs-esx-causing-worldwide-mayhem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/08/12/vmware-accidentally-timebombs-esx-causing-worldwide-mayhem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Reeuwijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timebomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an act of &#8220;endeavoring to deliver a release with support [that] customers deem important&#8221; VMware accidentally left a licensing timebomb enabled in the build that it shipped to customers about three weeks ago. The timebomb causes all installed licenses for ESX to be regarded as invalid on August 12, 2008. This in turn causes virtual machines [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an act of &#8220;<em>endeavoring to deliver a release with support [that] customers deem important</em>&#8221; VMware accidentally left a licensing timebomb enabled in the build that it shipped to customers about three weeks ago. The timebomb causes all installed licenses for ESX to be regarded as invalid on August 12, 2008. This in turn causes virtual machines to not be allowed to start from a powerdown or suspended state or allow virtual machines to be <span style="underline;">VMotioned to another ESX host</span>.</p>
<p><del datetime="00">VMware provides one way to prevent encountering the problem and one temporary workaround until they can provide a patch:</del> VMware has released express patches to remedy the problem.</p>
<p>Full repeat of VMware&#8217;s latest e-mail advisory:</p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Dear VMware Customers,</span></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">We have released the express patches for the product expiration issue. Please go to <a href="http://app.connect.vmware.com/e/er.aspx?s=524&amp;lid=3173&amp;elq=1DDB9A04C1FB4DD5A85715BBC19A8E1A" target="_blank"><strong><span style="#6699cc;">http://www.vmware.com/go/esxexpresspatches</span></strong></a> for download and KB articles. Since our last customer email we have completed our verification tests that the express patches we’ve released are fully compatible with the VMware Update Manager. Please see the KB articles for deployment information regarding Update Manager. </span></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">The KB articles are kept up-to-date. Please refer to the KB articles for information and updates. </span></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">In our last update, we referred to an initiative by our support and engineering teams to find an option to apply the patch without the necessity of entering maintenance mode and VMotion of VM’s to other servers, or VM power-off and re-power-on. Our earlier tests have not found a consistently successful way to address this. We continue to investigate this possibility, as we know that it would reduce the maintenance burden on our customers who may not have a patched server available for VMotion. </span></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">We are on target to release updated versions of the ESX/ESXi 3.5 Update 2 patch at 6 PM PST today. This is for customers who have not already upgraded to the previously released version of ESX/ESXi 3.5 Update 2</span></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Thank you, </span></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">The VMware ESX Product Team </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Problem:</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">An issue has been discovered by many VMware customers and partners with ESX Update 2 (build number 103909) and ESXi 3.5 Update 2 (build number 103908) where Virtual Machines fail to power on or VMotion successfully. This problem began to occur on August 12, 2008 for customers that had upgraded to ESX 3.5 Update 2. The problem is caused by a build timeout that was mistakenly left enabled for the release build.</span></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">The following message is displayed in the vmware.log file for the virtual machine:</span></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">This product has expired. Be sure that your host machine&#8217;s date and time are set correctly.<br />
There is a more recent version available at the VMware web site: <a href="http://app.connect.vmware.com/e/er.aspx?s=524&amp;lid=3174&amp;elq=1DDB9A04C1FB4DD5A85715BBC19A8E1A" target="_blank"><strong><span style="#6699cc;">http://www.vmware.com/info?id=4</span></strong></a>.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Module License Power on failed.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Affected Products:</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">- VMware ESX 3.5 Update 2 &amp; ESXi 3.5 Update 2. Thank you, The VMware ESX Product Team </span></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">- The problem will be seen if ESX350-200806201-UG is applied to a system.</span></p>
<p><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">- No other VMware products are affected. </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Resolution:</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="AR-SA;">VMware Engineering has produced express patches for impacted customers to resolve the issue</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/08/12/vmware-accidentally-timebombs-esx-causing-worldwide-mayhem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCVMM, choose your CPU Type wisely</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/07/31/scvmm-choose-your-cpu-type-wisely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/07/31/scvmm-choose-your-cpu-type-wisely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wiebe Niehof</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago my beloved colleague Walter gave me the Beta version of System Center Virtual Machine Manager. Unfortunately I haven&#8217;t had the time to play with it until now. While most people enjoy their well earned vacation, I&#8217;m playing around with SCVMM. There are definitely things to be excited about: Ability to manage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scvmm1.jpg" rel="lightbox[388]"></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">A few months ago my beloved colleague Walter <a href="http://www.buit.org/2008/05/02/system-center-virtual-machine-manager-2008/" target="_blank"><span style="11.0pt;">gave</span></a> me the Beta version of System Center Virtual Machine Manager. Unfortunately I haven&#8217;t had the time to play with it until now. While most people enjoy their well earned vacation, I&#8217;m playing around with SCVMM.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">There are definitely things to be excited about:</span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">Ability to manage both Hyper-V and VMware farms</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">Migrate virtual machines between Hyper-V hosts (maybe not a live migration, but a migration none the less! )</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">But the main thing to be excited about is the future integration within the System Center family.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">And their are also some irritating things:</span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">Hyper-V has just RTM&#8217;ed and SCVMM is still in beta. This means you got to install <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050"><span style="11.0pt;">update</span></a> after <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=88208468-0AD6-47DE-8580-085CBA42C0C2"><span style="11.0pt;">update</span></a> to make everything work.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">When I try to install the integration services on Windows Vista it comes with the message: &#8220;Unsupported Guest OS &#8211; An error has occurred: The specified program requires a newer version of Windows.&#8221; Unfortunately I&#8217;m not yet in the possession of Windows 7&#8230; </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">I created a new library share. But when I try to mount an ISO file to my virtual machine it fails and the only thing you can do with your virtual machine from that point is remove it and repair it. Through the repair option you can save him by the way.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">I properly can go on and on with these things but I can rather posts these on connect.microsoft.com. It is still a beta and I believe eventually these &#8216;minor&#8217; issues will be solved.</span></p>
<p><span style="AR-SA;">There is one very interesting feature I found in SCVMM and I&#8217;m still not sure if it&#8217;s a brilliant or stupid thing. When you create a new virtual machine you got to choose your processor type. Not just the number of virtual processors or the clock rate, no actually the processor type. Like the 1.2 Ghz Athlon, the 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4 (HT Technology) or the 2.8 Ghz Xeon MP.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scvmm1.jpg" rel="lightbox[388]"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-390" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scvmm1-290x300.jpg" alt="Choose your CPU type within SCVMM" width="290" height="300" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">It states that it uses this info to determine the processor requirements of the virtual machine. That&#8217;s being used when calculating host ratings and when setting CPU resource allocations.<br />
You can view the host rating when you create a new virtual machine. The host rating helps you to choose the best host for your virtual machine. Based on free resources.<br />
CPU resource allocation is something we know from VMware ESX. VMware uses shares to do this. A plain number like 1000 or 2000. The virtual machine with 2000 shares gets twice the amount of CPU cycles (when needed) in comparison with the machine that has 1000 shares.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">I understand that SCVMM should use his own system that can be plotted on all the different virtualization platforms it&#8217;s going to manage (Hyper-V, XEN, ESX). But I don&#8217;t understand how a 2.4 Ghz Opteron relates to a 2.4 Ghz Xeon.<br />
So if I just want my production server to have a 50% preference over my test server which should I choose? And what&#8217;s worse, if I&#8217;m in doubt with this option, how about a self service user that&#8217;s got the option to create a new virtual machine? I can imagine it would properly mean that this user got the advise to skip it.</span></p>
<p><span style="AR-SA;">But there is one more thing confusing about this. When you use the Virtual Machine Manager snap in, there is another way to set the processor weight and you can use a simple number!</span><br />
<a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/vmm.jpg" rel="lightbox[388]"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-391" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/vmm.jpg" alt="VMM Processor Resources" width="441" height="334" /></a></p>
<p>So if I change the processor type in SCVMM of a virtual machine, you would suspect something to change within this screen. But it doesn&#8217;t&#8230; Neither does it the other way around.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to investigate some more but if you got some tips or hints, please post them!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scvmm.jpg" rel="lightbox[388]"></a><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scvmm.jpg" rel="lightbox[388]"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/07/31/scvmm-choose-your-cpu-type-wisely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye VMWare Server 2, Hello Exchange &#8216;14&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/06/06/goodbye-vmware-server-2-hello-exchange-14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/06/06/goodbye-vmware-server-2-hello-exchange-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Reeuwijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2008/06/06/goodbye-vmware-server-2-hello-exchange-14/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have had a love/hate relationship with the VMWare Server 2 beta for the last couple of months and today, I’m sorry to say we have parted ways. First up, my quarrel is not with VMWare products as a whole (I still love Workstation and ESX) but frankly with the poor interaction you get with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a love/hate relationship with the VMWare Server 2 beta for the last couple of months and today, I’m sorry to say we have parted ways. First up, my quarrel is not with VMWare products as a whole (I still love Workstation and ESX) but frankly with the poor interaction you get with VMWare in their own beta programs. It really is a far, far cry from the type of interaction and feedback you get in the Microsoft beta programs…</p>
<p>I would have been able to live with the lack of interaction if I weren’t having any major problems with the product. But as such things go, I ran into one showstopping problem… It turns out that on <strong>my</strong> hardware (which is a big, tricked out server that cost a small fortune and which I am <strong>not</strong> replacing) VMWare Server 2 had major issues correctly virtualizing Windows Server 2008 x64. Just that one OS. Everything else worked fine: Windows 2003 x86 &amp; x64, even Windows 2008 x86 ran without a hitch. It has to be said that this is not a generic problem, since most others either don’t run into the problem (on a HP nx6325 laptop I also have no issues whatsoever), or they just don’t understand why things are breaking. But I’m certainly not the only one, judging from the replies and the 300+ views on the <a href="http://communities.vmware.com/thread/141069;jsessionid=05A6E608C30B3CF7C2E2529917382870?tstart=0" target="_blank">thread I posted</a> in the VMWare Server 2 beta 2 community.</p>
<p>Now, I could manage without Windows 2008 x64 servers for a good while, since Exchange 2007 also runs on Windows 2003 (or if you’re really nuts like me, you can hack the x86 version on Windows 2008 into production <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). But now that I’m participating in the Exchange ‘14’ TAP, I just have to have a Windows 2008 x64 machine. Either that or just don’t bother at all.</p>
<p>In my experience with Microsoft Technology Adoption Programs, Microsoft usually goes above and beyond to help their customers if they run into a blocking problem with the product, even if you are the only customer experiencing the problem. The experience with VMWare was pretty much the opposite, unfortunately. I have filed not one but two Support Requests and never have gotten more interaction than the support engineer asking me to run their support-info-gathering script (vm-support.vbs) and attaching the output to the Support Request. After that, either the support engineers go deaf or they just can’t help me anymore <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So now I have grown tired of waiting for information that won’t come and I have decided to uninstall VMWare Server 2 and install VMWare Workstation 6 instead. I would’ve installed Hyper-V, but alas my 1st gen AMD Opterons don’t support the CPU Virtualization extensions needed for Hyper-V…</p>
<p>I’m actually quite sad to see VMWare Server 2 go, because I <strong>really</strong> liked the way you could manage VMWare Server 2 via the standard VMWare Virtual Infrastructure Client, even over the internet. I liked where VMWare Server 2 was going but it seems it was just to immature for my bleeding-edge needs…</p>
<p>Anyway, Workstation 6 has taken over now and my first Exchange ‘14’ server is (virtually) buzzing with a large grin <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That’s a dozen more mailboxes to add to the running-Exchange-‘14’-in-production-count, DavidEsp!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/06/06/goodbye-vmware-server-2-hello-exchange-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Management Summit Day 1</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/04/30/microsoft-management-summit-day-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/04/30/microsoft-management-summit-day-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Luppes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMS 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2008/04/30/microsoft-management-summit-day-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On MMS Day 1 the keynote was opened by Bob Muglia (VP Server &#38; Tools Business) This keynote was all about Dynamic IT, the 10 year vision of Microsoft in how to operate dynamic datacenters. Currently Microsoft is in year 5 of this vision and realy showed some cool stuff in the keynote compared to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On MMS Day 1 the keynote was opened by Bob Muglia (VP Server &amp; Tools Business)</p>
<p>This keynote was all about Dynamic IT, the 10 year vision of Microsoft in how to operate dynamic datacenters. Currently Microsoft is in year 5 of this vision and realy showed some cool stuff in the keynote compared to how we managed our environments 5 years ago. I realy like the vision Microsoft is having on a Dynamic Datacenter using virtualisation, not only on the OS layer but also on the application layer.</p>
<p>In a Dynamic Datacenter all services are devided in 4 layers:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hardware
<li>Hardware Virtualisation
<li>Application Virtualisation
<li>Models</li>
</ul>
<p>The hardware layer can be managed with System Center Configuration Manager, during the keynote Microsoft did a demo on how Dynamic IT is working for server deployment. Just by using Server 2008 Server Roles en Features, a Configuration Manager Task Sequencer and a special plugin from Dell in this sequencer Microsoft was able to install a domain controller unattende on a Dell server. During this unattende installation it was possible to do the RAID settings, BIOS settings and other hardware based setting needed to roll-out the server to be compliant with the rest of the infrastructure. This way there is no need for an administrator to be present in a datacenter and still you will be able to roll out servers.</p>
<p>On the Hardware Virtualisation Layer, Microsoft did a demo of Virtual Machine Manager 2008 beta that was anounced during the keynote. A cool feature of VMM2008 is that it is able to manage VMware ESX servers, so in the near future it will be possible to manage your Virtual environment from 1 tool. This tool also supports Live migration of VMware machines. Like other Microsoft tooling VMM2008 also gives the output of the tasks you perform as an PowerShell script, so administrators that do not master PowerShell still have the abbility to automate repeating tasks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/windowslivewritermicrosoftmanagementsummitday1-b584erik-luppes-2.jpg" rel="lightbox[352]"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="244" alt="erik luppes" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/windowslivewritermicrosoftmanagementsummitday1-b584erik-luppes-thumb.jpg" width="231" align="left" border="0"></a>Microsoft also announced the beta of SCOM Cross Platform Monitoring, that Walter described in last post.</p>
<p>So if you are interested in the slides of the Keynote on day 1 you can watch the here :</p>
<p><a href="http://fotolog.buit.org/thumbnails.php?album=7" target="_blank">Slidedeck Keynote Day 1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/04/30/microsoft-management-summit-day-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization bound and bites</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/03/04/virtualization-bound-and-bites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/03/04/virtualization-bound-and-bites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Eikenboom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longhorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2008/03/04/virtualization-bound-and-bites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Converting some virtual images form our ESX 3.5 environment to a demo machine did have some impact on on my demo machine. The demo machine running the RTM bit of Server 2008 64bits with Hyper-V for some initial testing, did surprise my happily. Fast responses and 10Gb network adapters for internal communication works great and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Converting some virtual images form our ESX 3.5 environment to a demo machine did have some impact on on my demo machine. The demo machine running the RTM bit of Server 2008 64bits with Hyper-V for some initial testing, did surprise my happily. Fast responses and 10Gb network adapters for internal communication works great and fast. Just a few things I bumped into installing Hyper-V, Hyper-V has a problem with the non-US regional settings. If your installing Hyper-V and don&#8217;t have the regional setting to English US the role will not install. Changing the regional settings back to US-English fixed the problem for me.</p>
<p>Installing VMWare workstation 6.0.2 on the demo machine, Server 2008,  was no problem at all. It run fine until you start a virtual machine inside VMWare:-(. The Virtual machine will boot and after 30 sec in the boot process you will get a blue screen on Server 2008, error code 0&#215;0000124. Just uninstall the Hyper-V role, reboot, and the problem is solved.</p>
<p>Hyper-V is still in beta so no hard feelings there. I think Hyper-V alone is a good candidate for server consolidation, in combination with Virtual Machine Manager it could be a lot more for less, Hyper-V only costs $28 extra on top of Server 2008.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Walter Eikenboom<br />
<a href="http://weblogwally.spacel.live.com/"></a><a href="http://weblogwally.spaces.live.com">http://weblogwally.spaces.live.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/03/04/virtualization-bound-and-bites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Open Virtual Machine Format</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/02/26/the-open-virtual-machine-format/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/02/26/the-open-virtual-machine-format/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wiebe Niehof</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2008/02/26/the-open-virtual-machine-format/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, I&#8217;m at Vmworld 2008 Europe (Cannes) right now. Virtualisation is hot and you can tell by the enormous amount of people that came to Cannes. A lot of interesting new product and enhancements have been release here today but there is one thing I want to mention here. The Open Virtual Machine Format (OVF). At this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m at Vmworld 2008 Europe (Cannes) right now. Virtualisation is hot and you can tell by the enormous amount of people that came to Cannes. A lot of interesting new product and enhancements have been release here today but there is one thing I want to mention here.</p>
<p>The Open Virtual Machine Format (OVF). At this point it is still in beta (0.9) but a 1.0 version is coming out very shortly. It&#8217;s a new way you on how to offer your virtual appliances and supported by Vmware, Citrix (Xenserver) and Microsoft Hyper-V. You can create your virtual appliance in any of these environments and package it as an OVF package. The virtual appliance can even exist out of multiple virtual machine.</p>
<p>This OVF package can be imported on to any of these hypervisors (that&#8217;s the open part of it) and it automatically build the right virtual machine(s) with the correct virtual components (Nic&#8217;s, CPU, memory etc). It also builds the correct virtual disk format, VMDK, VHD or even RDM or NTFS.</p>
<p>Read more about this new portable virtual machine format here: <a href="http://www.vmware.com/go/ovf">http://www.vmware.com/go/ovf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/02/26/the-open-virtual-machine-format/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

