<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Innovative Technology Weblog &#187; System Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buit.org/category/system-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buit.org</link>
	<description>Innovative Technology presented by Innovative People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Automate 3rd party software, drivers and BIOS updates with the new System Center Update Publisher 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2011/05/30/automate-3rd-party-software-drivers-and-bios-updates-with-the-new-system-center-update-publisher-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2011/05/30/automate-3rd-party-software-drivers-and-bios-updates-with-the-new-system-center-update-publisher-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 09:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dvanderuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Configuration Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Driver updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCCM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCUP 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With System Center Update Publisher (SCUP) Microsoft provides a platform for adding 3rdparty updates to your conventional WSUS updates. Until last week SCUP 4.5 was available for adding 3rd party software, driver and BIOS updates to a WSUS server. With SCUP you can either use a catalog file to import multiple updates from a vendor’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With System Center Update Publisher (SCUP) Microsoft provides a platform for adding 3<sup>rd</sup>party updates to your conventional WSUS updates. Until last week SCUP 4.5 was available for adding 3<sup>rd</sup> party software, driver and BIOS updates to a WSUS server. With SCUP you can either use a catalog file to import multiple updates from a vendor’s website at once or just simply add your own update packages to SCUP to deploy it in your enterprise environment as they were Microsoft updates. Now, with SCUP 4.5 there were some issues which are resolved within SCUP 2011. Some of the issues include the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Limited configuration options for download behavior (i.e. metadata only vs full content)</li>
<li>Expired updates cannot be removed from the updates server easily</li>
<li>Approval and publishing updates requires multiple steps to be taken</li>
</ul>
<p>With SCUP 2011 you now have a so called ConfigMgr integration. This integration option can be used to regulate download behavior for an update. In general you probably want clients to download only metadata from SCCM/SCUP if only a few clients request an update. When the number of clients increase it would be better to download full content so that clients will use common distribution points instead of an internet location to download the update to avoid unnecessary bandwidth utilization. With the thresholds you can regulate this now.</p>
<p>Expiring and removing updates properly was a hell of a job if an update was removed from a vendor’s catalog. In SCUP 2011 you can use a new Software Update Cleanup Wizard for this. So now, expiring a software update that exists on the update server but is not in the SCUP repository is an easy job.</p>
<p>SCUP 2011 has a Publish tab where you can bundle updates that you want to deploy to your clients. This is a new feature that makes it somewhat easier to manage and administer the SCUP update repository.</p>
<p>What I like the most about SCUP is that you are able to deploy software with the WSUS functionality available. In large enterprise environments normal software distribution requires lots of steps to be taken by various departments for each individual software update. These steps include scripting, testing, configure SCCM packages, collections, advertisements, etc. New software updates like Adobe’s Flash Player are being released very rapidly. It requires that you’ll have to execute the same procedure over again to deploy it in your enterprise. Using SCUP and Adobe’s update catalog instead will save you a lot of time.</p>
<p>Installing drivers, BIOS, hardware utilities and firmware for instance on Dell systems is an easy job using SCUP. Minor disadvantage is that you will need the OpenManage client running on client systems to provide some necessary WMI classes. These extra classes will be used to identify the hardware peripherals. WSUS uses this information to compare with the catalog logic rules:</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/s002.png" rel="lightbox[722]"><img class="size-full wp-image-724 aligncenter" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/s002.png" alt="" width="600" height="418" /></a></p>
<p>With SCUP you can use the logic which comes with the catalogs to deploy a software update bundle that include multiple updates at once. Compare the logic within the catalog with the queries you normally use in SCCM collections for grouping the client systems what you’ll need for targeting the software.</p>
<p>You can also create your own updates. As an example i’ve added the Google Chrome browser installer as a required update with Adobe Flash Player as a prerequisite <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/s003.png" rel="lightbox[722]"><img class="size-full wp-image-725 aligncenter" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/s003.png" alt="" width="624" height="114" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left">Happy updating!!!</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Douwe van de Ruit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2011/05/30/automate-3rd-party-software-drivers-and-bios-updates-with-the-new-system-center-update-publisher-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HOWTO: Bitlocker Status Reporting in SCCM 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2010/08/18/howto-bitlocker-status-reporting-in-sccm-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2010/08/18/howto-bitlocker-status-reporting-in-sccm-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dvanderuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Configuration Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bitlocker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently had to come up with a solution that will enable administrators to build reports for client&#8217;s bitlocker status. To do so i found a few articles on the web that pointed me in the right direction, however i didn&#8217;t found a complete howto for it so that&#8217;s a good reason for me to post a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/Ne4UKlVEWV4hPb8NvV6X1Q?feat=directlink"></a>I recently had to come up with a solution that will enable administrators to build reports for client&#8217;s bitlocker status. To do so i found a few articles on the web that pointed me in the right direction, however i didn&#8217;t found a complete howto for it so that&#8217;s a good reason for me to post a complete one.</p>
<p>To enable bitlocker status reporting in a centralised management environment with SCCM you need to follow some steps because bitlocker is not integrated that far (yet??) in the Windows OS. First, let&#8217;s first take a look at the status information that bitlocker provides:</p>
<ul>
<li>Volume name, example: <strong>C: [OSDisk]</strong></li>
<li>Disk size, example: <strong>148,75 GB</strong></li>
<li>BitLocker Version, example: <strong>Windows 7</strong></li>
<li>Conversion Status, example: <strong>Fully Encrypted</strong></li>
<li>Percentage Encrypted, example: <strong>100%</strong></li>
<li>Encryption Method, example: <strong>AES 128 with Diffuser</strong></li>
<li>Protection Status, example: <strong>Protection On</strong></li>
<li>Lock Status, example: <strong>Unlocked</strong></li>
<li>Identification Field, example: <strong>None</strong></li>
<li>Key Protectors (Note: multivalue), example: <strong>TPM, Numerical Password</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>You can check the above on clients using the commandline tool <em>manage-bde.exe -status</em> on Windows 7 clients. For Vista clients use <em>cscript manage-bde.wsf -status. </em></p>
<p><strong>Step 1. Modify and deploy SMS_DEF.MOF</strong></p>
<p>We want bitlocker status information to be inventoried to SCCM. A proper way of doing that would be to add the bitlocker class to the <em>SMS_DEF.MOF </em>file on the management point (found in %SCCMinstallpath%\inboxes\clifiles.src\hinv). Make a copy of this file and edit with your favorite app. Add the following lines at the end of the file:</p>
<div>#pragma namespace (&#8220;\\\\.\\root\\cimv2\\SMS&#8221;) <strong>//make sure to use normal quotes!</strong><br />
#pragma deleteclass(&#8220;SCCM_BitLocker&#8221;,NOFAIL)</div>
<div>[ SMS_Report     (TRUE),</div>
<div>SMS_Group_Name ("SCCM_BitLocker"),</div>
<div>SMS_Class_ID   ("CUSTOM|SCCM_BitLocker|1.0") ]</div>
<div>class SCCM_BitLocker : SMS_Class_Template</div>
<div>{</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE), key ] string Drive;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string DriveLabel;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string Size;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string BitLocker_Version;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string Conversion_Status;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string Percentage_Encrypted;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string Encryption_Method;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string Protection_Status;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string Lock_Status;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string Identification_Field;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string Key_Protectors;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string Automatic_Unlock;</div>
<div>[SMS_Report (TRUE)] string ScriptLastRun;</div>
<div>};</div>
<p><em>[edit] Make sure to replace any fancy double quotes with normal quotes after copying because otherwise compiling or parsing will fail. Or download this file: <a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/bitlocker_mof1.txt">bitlocker_mof</a>.</em></p>
<p>You should check the file for errors with <em>mofcomp.exe -check SMS_DEF.MOF.</em> To enable the MOF file on a single client run the following command on the client <em>mofcomp -class:forceupdate %pathtofile%\SMS_DEF.MOF. </em>Copy the edited file back to enable it on your ConfigMgr site.</p>
<p><strong>Step 2. Install Bitlocker</strong></p>
<p>Create and link a GPO to apply on the bitlocker clients that contain the following settings (or similair based on your own requirements):</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="100%" valign="top">Machine | Administrative Templates | System | Trusted Platform Module Services</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79%" valign="top">Turn on TPM backup to Active Directory Domain Services</td>
<td width="21%" valign="top">Enabled</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="100%" valign="top">Machine | Administrative Templates | Windows Components | BitLocker Drive Encryption | Operating Sytem Drives</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79%" valign="top">Choose how BitLocker-protected operating system drives can be recovered</td>
<td width="21%" valign="top">Enabled</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79%" valign="top">Allow data recovery agent</td>
<td width="21%" valign="top">Disabled</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79%" valign="top">Configure user storage of BitLocker recovery information:</td>
<td width="21%" valign="top">Require 48-digit recovery passwordAllow 256-bit recovery key</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79%" valign="top">Omit recovery options from the BitLocker setup wizard</td>
<td width="21%" valign="top">Enabled</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79%" valign="top">Save BitLocker recovery information to AD DS for operating system drives</td>
<td width="21%" valign="top">Enabled</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79%" valign="top">Configure storage of BitLocker recovery information to AD DS:</td>
<td width="21%" valign="top">Store recovery passwords and key packages</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79%" valign="top">Do not enable BitLocker until recovery information is stored to AD DS for operating system drives</td>
<td width="21%" valign="top">Disabled</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Enter the BIOS on your client or use tools like the Dell client configuration utility to turn on TPM, clear the TPM and activate it. After doing this enable bitlocker encryption on the machine. You can use any method to achive this.</p>
<p><strong>Step 3. Add Bitlocker status to WMI &amp; run hw inventory</strong></p>
<p>Although there are multiple ways of manipulating bitlocker through WMI you still need a script to read, update and store bitlocker status information in the WMI repository (see <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa376409.aspx">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa376409.aspx</a>). This is because Managed Object Format (MOF) files are not installed as part of the Windows SDK and therefore the included classes are not added to the WMI repository automatically by Windows itself.</p>
<p><em><strong>[update: A handy colleague wrote a powershell version of the script for adding the bitlocker status into WMI with some nice enhancements. All credits go to Daniel Last.]</strong></em></p>
<p>The scripts (use only one):</p>
<ul>
<li>VBS version: <a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/UpdateBitlockerStatus.zip">UpdateBitlockerStatus.vbs</a></li>
<li>Powershell verion: <a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Bitlocker_Status.zip"><span style="text-decoration: line-through">Bitlocker_Status.ps1</span></a> <a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Bitlocker_Status_v1.1.ps1_.zip">Bitlocker_Status_v1.1.ps1</a> [update]</li>
</ul>
<p>Run the script and after that initiate a hardware inventory on the client. Note that the powershell version of the script already triggers a hardware inventory. Additionally, the powershell script need to be run with the powershell execution policy to be set to RemoteSigned. Do this using the following cmdlet: <em>Set-ExecutionPolicy RemoteSigned</em></p>
<p><strong>[edit] You could trigger the inventory in the vbscript by adding this line: </strong>WshShell.Run “WMIC /namespace:\\root\ccm path sms_client CALL TriggerSchedule “&amp;Chr(34) &amp; “{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001}” &amp; Chr(34) &amp; ” /NOINTERACTIVE”,,true</p>
<p>After a while you will find 2 new tables and 1 new view in the SCCM site database:</p>
<p><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_lWnCoC2_6_I/TGvOcQjeLdI/AAAAAAAAHRk/VppR7vyxT3o/%5C%5CFile0011%5CBestusr2%24%5CRuitD%5CMijn%20Documenten%5CMijn%20Afbeeldingen%5Cbitlocker.jpg" rel="lightbox[659]"><img src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_lWnCoC2_6_I/TGvOcQjeLdI/AAAAAAAAHRk/VppR7vyxT3o/%5C%5CFile0011%5CBestusr2%24%5CRuitD%5CMijn%20Documenten%5CMijn%20Afbeeldingen%5Cbitlocker.jpg" alt="" width="741" height="234" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_lWnCoC2_6_I/TGvOcQjeLdI/AAAAAAAAHRk/VppR7vyxT3o/%5C%5CFile0011%5CBestusr2%24%5CRuitD%5CMijn%20Documenten%5CMijn%20Afbeeldingen%5Cbitlocker.jpg" rel="lightbox[659]"></a></p>
<p><strong>Step 4. Create the Report</strong></p>
<p>I created a report in SCCM with the following query:</p>
<p><em>SELECT     v_R_System.Name0 AS Computername, v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.Bitlocker_Status0 AS [Bitlocker Status],<br />
v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.BitLocker_Version0 AS [Bitlocker Versie], v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.Conversion_Status0 AS [Converstion Status],<br />
v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.Drive0 AS Drive, v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.DriveLabel0 AS DriveLabel, v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.Encryption_Method0 AS [Encryption Method],<br />
v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.Identification_Field0 AS [Identification Field], v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.Key_Protectors0 AS [Key Protectors],<br />
v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.Percentage_Encrypted0 AS [Percentage Encrypted], v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.Protection_Status0 AS [Protection Status],<br />
v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.ScriptLastRun0 AS [Script Last Run]<br />
FROM         v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0 INNER JOIN<br />
v_R_System ON v_GS_SCCM_BitLocker0.ResourceID = v_R_System.ResourceID</em></p>
<p>And there it is, the Bitlocker report (note: old screenshot based another query but more or less similar):</p>
<p><a href="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_lWnCoC2_6_I/TGvOcY8LS-I/AAAAAAAAHRo/NURzqji2SAM/%5C%5CFile0011%5CBestusr2%24%5CRuitD%5CMijn%20Documenten%5CMijn%20Afbeeldingen%5Cbitlocker_report.jpg" rel="lightbox[659]"><img class="alignnone" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_lWnCoC2_6_I/TGvOcY8LS-I/AAAAAAAAHRo/NURzqji2SAM/%5C%5CFile0011%5CBestusr2%24%5CRuitD%5CMijn%20Documenten%5CMijn%20Afbeeldingen%5Cbitlocker_report.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="184" /></a></p>
<p><em>Tested on SCCM R2 with a Windows 7 Enterprise bitlocker client. </em></p>
<p>Feel free to comment on this post.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Douwe van de Ruit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2010/08/18/howto-bitlocker-status-reporting-in-sccm-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>do more with less in System Center Configuration Manager.Next (Beta 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2010/05/28/do-more-with-less-in-system-center-configuration-manager-next-beta-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2010/05/28/do-more-with-less-in-system-center-configuration-manager-next-beta-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 08:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dvanderuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Configuration Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v.Next]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi i’m Douwe van de Ruit, a new blogger at buit.org and right now i have some nice things to share about the upcoming System Center Configuration Manager.next. Microsoft released Beta 1 last Tuesday so i downloaded it from the Microsoft connect site and kicked it in a virtual testlab to dig through the new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi i’m Douwe van de Ruit, a new blogger at buit.org and right now i have some nice things to share about the upcoming System Center Configuration Manager.next. Microsoft released Beta 1 last Tuesday so i downloaded it from the Microsoft connect site and kicked it in a virtual testlab to dig through the new features and changes. I will show some new features from which i have great expectations. I will stick to the headlines only because covering all newly or changed features will be to much for a blogpost.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/vnext-instalscreen3.png" rel="lightbox[629]"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-648" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/vnext-instalscreen3-300x216.png" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a></p>
<p>While installing SCCM.next i found out that the procedure was very similar to the way SCCM 2007 is installed. But when i started the Admin console i finally saw the “Outlook-styled” console for SCCM that is inline with consoles used for OpsMgr and VmMgr!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/vnext-admin-console4.png" rel="lightbox[629]"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-649" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/vnext-admin-console4-300x249.png" alt="" width="300" height="249" /></a></p>
<p>A good example of &#8220;do more with less&#8221; will be client settings, all settings are simplified by consolidating them in just one, simple and faste editable setting-interface:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/vnext-client-settings1.png" rel="lightbox[629]"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-650" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/vnext-client-settings1-300x190.png" alt="" width="300" height="190" /></a></p>
<p>So the interfacelifted GUI is a big change included in SCCM.next. But what about functionality and features? Well, Googling on vNext will return 3 main focus areas where Microsoft would deliver changed functionalities:</p>
<ol>
<li><em>User centric application management  – Empowering Administrators to define intent, and end users flexible access to the right application at the right time</em></li>
<li><em>Infrastructure simplification – Simplify management infrastructure, processes and administrative overhead</em></li>
<li><em>Simplify Client Management – Daily tasks, model based configuration management and improvements over existing capabilities</em></li>
</ol>
<p>User centric comes with so called user device affinity rules as you like, which can be used to define user’s devices and priorize them in a way that some deployments can depend on these affinity rules. Additionally, it will allow admins to create definitions of the relationship between the users and their applications in a way that the admins don’t have to worry about where that user is and what device it&#8217;s using .  They can trust the system that the user will have the right application at the right time in the right place suitable for the device they are on. Just a screenshot that relates to the user centric management functionality:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/vnext-affinity-rules1.png" rel="lightbox[629]"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-651" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/vnext-affinity-rules1-300x246.png" alt="" width="300" height="246" /></a></p>
<p>Just looking at the interface already shows that all administrative tasks just got easier and smarter and will achieve better overall performance in using ConfigMgr for all tasks. Infrastructure and Client Management simplifications will take more investigation to find out significant improvements as opposed to SCCM 2007. However, i do know that distribution points in SCCM.next will support scheduling and throttling. Imagining a branch office with a considerable amount of clients, you normally would create a secondary site if there was a concern about content distribution bandwidth consumption during office hours. With SCCM.next now you&#8217;re not bound to secondary sites because you can use distribution points with scheduling and throttling capabilities using the newly added &#8221;Rate Limits&#8221; tab in distribution point settings.</p>
<p>By simplified client management Microsoft introduces the &#8220;Custom Client Setting&#8221;. With this feature you can create custom client agent settings which you can apply to collections containing devices, users or both. On top of the custom client settings you will still be able to configure the top-level client agent settings. The need for an extra Primary site will become unneccesary if the only reason would be driven out of other Client settings. Very nice.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/vnext-custom-client-settings.png" rel="lightbox[629]"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-653" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/vnext-custom-client-settings-300x228.png" alt="" width="300" height="228" /></a></p>
<p>To summarize some more new stuff i (quickly) found:</p>
<ul>
<li>added distribution groups for administrative purpose</li>
<li>SCCM.next is 64 bit only</li>
<li>SQL 2008 required</li>
<li>added more than 300 extra SQL tables in the site database</li>
<li>changed the term “Advertisements” into “Deployments”</li>
<li>added Global Conditions settings which can be used to divide device types based on various parameters</li>
<li>SQL Reporting service replaces standard reporting</li>
<li>the “inboxes” system is still in use (and not transformed into SQL based communication as introduced before as a “wanna have”)</li>
<li>&#8220;Create Report&#8221; function crashes in my test lab <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
<li>Help function returns white pixels <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
<li>SCCM 2007 DCM and Assett Intelligence nodes are integrated into a &#8220;Assets and Compliance&#8221; tab</li>
<li>New System roles: Software Catalog Web Service Point, Software Catalog Web Site Point, Mobile device enrollment proxy point, Mobile device enrollment point</li>
</ul>
<p>Nice stuff so far :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2010/05/28/do-more-with-less-in-system-center-configuration-manager-next-beta-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selecting Virtualization Candidates with SCOM 2007 R2</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2009/06/11/selecting-virtualization-candidates-with-scom-2007-r2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2009/06/11/selecting-virtualization-candidates-with-scom-2007-r2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Eikenboom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operations Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpsMgr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOM 2007 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2009/06/11/selecting-virtualization-candidates-with-scom-2007-r2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OpsMgr is mainly used to get a grip on you server infrastructure and to optimize performance and availability by using best practice, which knowledge provide in the MP’s, and resolve errors with a head start with the provided knowledge. But the next step into monitoring is getting the most out of your infrastructure and Virtualization [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpsMgr is mainly used to get a grip on you server infrastructure and to optimize performance and availability by using best practice, which knowledge provide in the MP’s, and resolve errors with a head start with the provided knowledge. But the next step into monitoring is getting the most out of your infrastructure and Virtualization is one of these things that can help you get there.</p>
<p>Currently a lot of organizations want to save money and cut back on hardware and power with the great green IT wave landing in most organizations right now. OpsMgr can help you that. VMM 2008 has the ability to manage and optimize performance, load and availability and cut back on the off hour work by leveraging the heterogenic environment to a single management console in combination with PRO ( <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/virtualmachinemanager/en/us/whats-new.aspx" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #2e8fc6;">Performance and Resource Optimization</span></strong></a> ) it does give you the insides and tips in your environment. So System Center Operations Manager and Virtual Machine Manager will give you the tools you need the manage it all.</p>
<p>But how can i select the best virtualization candidate in my environment to make the first steps in optimizing my infrastructure? The answer is easier than expected.</p>
<p>To select the best virtualization candidates just import the<strong> </strong><em>System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2008</em> and the <em><strong>System Center Virtualization Reports 2008</strong></em> Management pack from the catalog to run the report for virtualization candidate selection, <strong>even</strong> when you not using VMM 2008 in your environment.</p>
<p>This MP is not only for the SCOM 2007 R2 users but can be used in SCOM 2007 SP1 too. Just download the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=d6d5cddd-4ec8-4e3c-8ab1-102ec99c257f&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #2e8fc6;">System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2008 Management Pack for System Center Operations Manager 2007</span></strong></a> and import the Microsoft.SystemCenter.VirtualMachineManager.2008.mp and the Microsoft.Virtualization.Reports.2008.mp and you can run your reports.</p>
<p>Getting into the report go, in the SCOM console, to the reporting area and navigate to the System <em>Center Virtualization reports 2008</em>  and select the <em><strong>Virtualization Candidates</strong></em> report. Now you can define the parameters for you selection of virtualization candidates.</p>
<p><a href="/Users/weikenboom/AppData/Local/Temp/WindowsLiveWriter1286139640/supfiles5C0A9C/image[11].png" rel="lightbox[508]"></a></p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="https://1b0wva.blu.livefilestore.com/y1mxOrpE05gey01iRkjubRVGyeSnswh1N2GASqfZ5S2JparQOuVY6yrrsWcsRkAADNEy6ZX_IqFIAFETZc3wh0YBdZhSS_c84yuvM89fUbW1n2QzEsIauY8BPM-Ao1KBhQQa_p4SewAp-5u75JmZckg3w/image[11].png" alt="" width="614" height="351" /> </p>
<p>Start identifying you virtualization candidates and building your dynamic datacenter, have fun with it!</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> The selection process for virtual candidates relays on the “Virtual machine” property “IsVirtualMachine” to be FALSE for selecting the physical machines in your environment. The downside to that property is that VMWare virtual machines are not detected so the generated reports will show the physical machines you want to see and the virtual VMWare machines.</p>
<p>The solution to that problem is the following Management pack made by Pete Zerger of the <a href="http://www.systemcentercentral.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #5f40a8;">System Center Central</span></a>. Thanks Pete!</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.systemcenterforum.org/downloads/virtual-machine-discovery-mp-for-opsmgr-2007/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #5f40a8;">Virtual Machine Discovery MP for OpsMgr 2007</span></a></strong></p>
<p>This MP extends existing discovery of virtual machines by Operations Manager and Essentials to include VMware guests. The MP will update the “IsVirtualMachine” property of the Windows Computer object to TRUE for VMware guests. Also disables and replaces the existing discovery rule that sets this value to false for non-MS VMs.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Walter Eikenboom<br />
<a href="http://weblogwally.spaces.live.com"><strong><span style="color: #2e8fc6;">http://weblogwally.spaces.live.com</span></strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2009/06/11/selecting-virtualization-candidates-with-scom-2007-r2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to integrate App-V with SCCM without losing the features you care about</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2009/02/13/how-to-integrate-app-v-with-sccm-without-losing-the-features-you-care-about/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2009/02/13/how-to-integrate-app-v-with-sccm-without-losing-the-features-you-care-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Reeuwijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Configuration Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCCM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2009/02/13/how-to-integrate-app-v-with-sccm-without-losing-the-features-you-care-about/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most anticipated features of SCCM 2007 R2 is &#8220;App-V Integration&#8221;. We have recently tested the end-to-end scenario for this integration and we can say with confidence: it BLOWS . In a nutshell, by integrating App-V with SCCM you lose App-V&#8217;s best features and reduce the solution to something that&#8217;s even worse than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most anticipated features of SCCM 2007 R2 is &#8220;App-V Integration&#8221;. We have recently tested the end-to-end scenario for this integration and we can say with confidence: it BLOWS <span style="Wingdings"> <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </span>. In a nutshell, by integrating App-V with SCCM you lose App-V&#8217;s best features and reduce the solution to something that&#8217;s even worse than SCCM by itself!</p>
<p>So what happens when you enable the App-V/SCCM integration feature in the SCCM Management Console?</p>
<ul>
<li>Control of the App-V client is seized by the SCCM client. If you had App-V running on its own before you enabled the integration, you&#8217;ll notice that all App-V apps that are published through App-V&#8217;s Publishing Server are now rendered invalid. On launch you&#8217;ll get a &#8220;Unable to initialize package information (0×00000000)&#8221; error.</li>
<li>You must now publish your App-V apps through SCCM as &#8220;Virtual Application Packages&#8221;. This works by importing the .XML file of the App-V package. SCCM will distribute the packages to its Distribution Points and you can enable those Distribution Points for HTTP(S) streaming.</li>
<li>To get the App-V apps to your clients, you&#8217;ll have to create SCCM advertisements. Basically SCCM advertisements replace the App-V Publishing Server. The behavior of getting App-V apps to your desktop now becomes eerily similar to SCCM&#8217;s way of installing applications. No more getting your shortcuts immediately upon logon (like you get with App-V); you will have to go get a cup of coffee and hope that SCCM is willing to give you your apps today.</li>
<li>If you created non-mandatory assignments, then you&#8217;ll have to go to Add/Remove Programs yourself and click &#8220;Run&#8221; for all the apps that you want. However clicking &#8220;Run&#8221; doesn&#8217;t actually run your app, it only registers the App-V app with the local App-V client. Don&#8217;t expect to see any progress bar or visual feedback that the registration actually happened; just keep scouring around in your Start Menu in hope of finding the shortcuts for your new app.</li>
<li>If you created mandatory assignments, you&#8217;ll get one or more notifications from SCCM (after some time ofcourse) that SCCM has App-V apps for you that it would like to register with the local App-V client. It will do that on *every* desktop you logon to. Prepare to spend quite a bit of quality time with the SCCM Client…</li>
<li>If you&#8217;re using either Windows Terminal Services or Fast User Switching in Vista, you&#8217;re SOL because the SCCM Client is allergic to terminal sessions. You&#8217;ll get a message telling you that &#8220;No programs are available to run from a Terminal Services session&#8221;. How nice. If you happen to be running the console session, you won&#8217;t notice this limitation because at the console session, everything works just fine. So make sure you also test your solution via a terminal session so you won&#8217;t get caught by surprise.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>As a result of the findings described above, we were pretty disappointed with the solution and decided to reverse our decision to integrate App-V with SCCM. However we did like the idea of using SCCM Distribution Points to stream App-V apps from. So we had a go at doing a manual integration of App-V with SCCM so that we could use just the SCCM parts we wanted. The idea was inspired by <a href="http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/timmangan/archive/2008/11/23/the-best-of-two-worlds-in-app-v.aspx">Tim Mangan&#8217;s article</a> which included this diagram:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/021309-1903-howtointegr1.png" alt="" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>In his article he never got around to actually testing if it was possible to stream an application that was published by App-V&#8217;s Publishing Server from an SCCM Distribution Point. He only verified that is was possible to install the App-V app through an MSI with SCCM. So we ventured to get HTTP streaming working against SCCM Distribution Points, with the shortcuts still being provided by an App-V Publishing Server. In a nutshell: it works! You do have to setup a few mechanisms to get load balancing working though.</p>
<p>Here is how it works:</p>
<ul>
<li>First and foremost: <span style="underline">disable</span> the App-V integration with SCCM. To do this, go to the <em>SCCM Console <span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span> Site Database <span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span> Site Management <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> &lt;Site&gt; <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Site Settings <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Client Agents <span style="Wingdings">-&gt; </span>Advertised Programs Client Agent <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Properties</em> and make sure &#8220;Allow virtual application package advertisement&#8221; is NOT selected.</li>
<li>Enable your SCCM Distribution Points for BITS, HTTP and HTTPS content transfer. To do this, go to the <em>SCCM Console <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Site Database <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Site Management <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> &lt;Site&gt; <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Site Settings <span style="Wingdings">-&gt; </span>Site Systems <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> &lt;your DP&gt; <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> ConfigMgr distribution point <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Properties</em> and select &#8220;Allow clients to transfer content from this distribution point using BITS, HTTP and HTTPS&#8221;.</li>
<li>We found that (at least in the RTM version of SCCM 2007 R2) you don&#8217;t have to enable &#8220;virtual application streaming&#8221; on the &#8220;Virtual Applications&#8221; tab of the distribution point to be able to stream from a SCCM DP when using our manual integration. The added benefit of this is that you can now also use Secondary Site DP&#8217;s as streaming servers!</li>
<li>Set up an App-V Management Server on any server you like. You can even set it up on a SCCM server, it doesn&#8217;t matter. Use the default installation settings for the entire installation. After installation, set the Default Content Path to the following: <em>http://%SFT_SOFTGRIDSERVER%</em></li>
<li>
<div>Add an App-V package to SCCM for distribution and streaming:</div>
<ul>
<li>Go to the <em>SCCM Console <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Site Database <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Computer Management <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Software Distribution <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Packages<span style="Wingdings"> <span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> New <span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Package</em>. Enter the information about your package and click Next. Select &#8220;This package contains source files&#8221; and set the Source Directory to the location of your App-V package and click Finish. Note that you import the App-V package as a normal SCCM package and NOT as a Virtual Application Package. Importing it as a Virtual Application Package will cause the .SFT file in the App-V package to be renamed and cause the .SFT file to be added to not 1 but 2 locations on each SCCM Distribution Point, doubling storage requirements.</li>
<li>When the package is added to SCCM, find the Package ID and use it to update the streaming location in the App-V OSD files. For each OSD file in your App-V package, update the HREF statement to HTTP://%SFT_SOFTGRIDSERVER%/SMS_DP$/SMSPKG/&lt;<em>your SCCM Package ID</em>&gt;/&lt;<em>name of your SFT file</em>&gt;<br />
(If you are using a File Share Distribution Point, the IIS vdir may be different than SMS_DP$. Verify the vdir name in IIS Manager and ensure that all DP&#8217;s are either standard DP&#8217;s or File Share DP&#8217;s.)</li>
<li>Now add some SCCM Distribution Points to your package so that SCCM can distribute the App-V content</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<div>Import the same App-V package into the App-V Management Server so that you can distribute the shortcuts and set permissions:</div>
<ul>
<li>On the App-V Management Server, go to the App-V Management Console, go to <em>Applications</em><br />
<em><span style="Wingdings"><span style="Wingdings">-&gt;</span></span> Import Application</em> and go to the same App-V package folder. Select the .SPRJ file and click Open. Perform your regular App-V import steps and finish the import.</li>
<li>The imported applications in the App-V Management Console should now show the correct http:// paths to both the OSD file(s) and the SFT file(s).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>That&#8217;s it! Now just configure your App-V Clients on the desktops to use your newly setup App-V Management Server by configuring a Publishing Server and use Group Policy to set the %SFT_SOFTGRIDSERVER% to the name of a SCCM Distribution Point nearby. We set this variable to DNS name that uses DNS Round Robin to distribute the load to multiple DP&#8217;s.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2009/02/13/how-to-integrate-app-v-with-sccm-without-losing-the-features-you-care-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware makes a strange move</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/12/14/vmware-makes-a-strange-move/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/12/14/vmware-makes-a-strange-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wiebe Niehof</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[      Every day the battle in the virtualization market is getting more exciting.  Thursday (11 December 2008) VMware released update 3 for it&#8217;s free hypervisor: ESXi. No big deal right?But apparently they changed something in this update that could really change the way VMware virtual infrastructures will look like in a few months / years.  In the last 12 months we have seen a change [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span>     </p>
<div>
<p>Every day the battle in the virtualization market is getting more exciting. </p>
<p>Thursday (11 December 2008) VMware released update 3 for it&#8217;s free hypervisor: ESXi. No big deal right?But <a href="http://www.virtualization.info/2008/12/vmware-esxi-gets-update-3-and-fully.html" target="_blank">apparently</a> they changed something in this update that could really change the way VMware virtual infrastructures will look like in a few months / years. </p>
<p>In the last 12 months we have seen a change of focus within the virtualization battle. The hypervisor has really become a commodity and is free (ESXi &amp; Hyper-V). It&#8217;s all about managing the virtual infrastructure now. Microsoft released their System Center Virtual Machine Manager (VMM) for this. What makes VMM great is that it can manage different virtual infrastructures at only a fraction of the cost of other managing tools. VMM can also manage a VMware VI. The downside of this is the fact that although you can manage a VMware environment you will also need VirtualCenter. VMM needs VirtualCenter to pass the command to the ESX servers. So you would need double the licenses for management software for your VI. Smart move from VMware, because they are actually making their money with the extra features that VirtualCenter brings.</p>
<p>But with update 3 of ESXi, VMware has decided to <span style="underline;">fully unlock all A<span style="underline;">PI&#8217;s</span>. This means that any virtual machine managing tool can perform Vmotion activities on a VMware VI. This really diminishes the need for VirtualCenter. VMM would be able to perform the most important management tasks. For medium sized environments this would definitly be enough. You will have a stable hypervisor for free (ESXi) and the management tools for nearly nothing (VMM). </span></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure VMware has thought about this as well and is convinced about the business case for VirtualCenter. I hope they or anyone else on this blog will share this soon with me.</p></div>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/images/crosshairs-vm.jpg" alt="" width="209" height="210" /></p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong></p>
<p>Well this explains everything. </p>
<p><em> &#8221;Turns out that while fixing an API bug the API set got partially unlocked. Yes, you read that right, VMware didn’t mean to unlock the API set &#8211; at least not wholly and not yet. So, if you went out and started madly coding some killer VirtualCenter Client replacement then hold off because I’m told the U4 update will lock things back down again&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Read all about it, on this blog: <a href="http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2008/12/update-vmware-rcli-now-writes-to-esxi-free-hosts.html">http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2008/12/update-vmware-rcli-now-writes-to-esxi-free-hosts.html</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/12/14/vmware-makes-a-strange-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCVMM, choose your CPU Type wisely</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/07/31/scvmm-choose-your-cpu-type-wisely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/07/31/scvmm-choose-your-cpu-type-wisely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wiebe Niehof</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago my beloved colleague Walter gave me the Beta version of System Center Virtual Machine Manager. Unfortunately I haven&#8217;t had the time to play with it until now. While most people enjoy their well earned vacation, I&#8217;m playing around with SCVMM. There are definitely things to be excited about: Ability to manage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scvmm1.jpg" rel="lightbox[388]"></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">A few months ago my beloved colleague Walter <a href="http://www.buit.org/2008/05/02/system-center-virtual-machine-manager-2008/" target="_blank"><span style="11.0pt;">gave</span></a> me the Beta version of System Center Virtual Machine Manager. Unfortunately I haven&#8217;t had the time to play with it until now. While most people enjoy their well earned vacation, I&#8217;m playing around with SCVMM.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">There are definitely things to be excited about:</span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">Ability to manage both Hyper-V and VMware farms</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">Migrate virtual machines between Hyper-V hosts (maybe not a live migration, but a migration none the less! )</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">But the main thing to be excited about is the future integration within the System Center family.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">And their are also some irritating things:</span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">Hyper-V has just RTM&#8217;ed and SCVMM is still in beta. This means you got to install <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050"><span style="11.0pt;">update</span></a> after <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=88208468-0AD6-47DE-8580-085CBA42C0C2"><span style="11.0pt;">update</span></a> to make everything work.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">When I try to install the integration services on Windows Vista it comes with the message: &#8220;Unsupported Guest OS &#8211; An error has occurred: The specified program requires a newer version of Windows.&#8221; Unfortunately I&#8217;m not yet in the possession of Windows 7&#8230; </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="NL;">I created a new library share. But when I try to mount an ISO file to my virtual machine it fails and the only thing you can do with your virtual machine from that point is remove it and repair it. Through the repair option you can save him by the way.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">I properly can go on and on with these things but I can rather posts these on connect.microsoft.com. It is still a beta and I believe eventually these &#8216;minor&#8217; issues will be solved.</span></p>
<p><span style="AR-SA;">There is one very interesting feature I found in SCVMM and I&#8217;m still not sure if it&#8217;s a brilliant or stupid thing. When you create a new virtual machine you got to choose your processor type. Not just the number of virtual processors or the clock rate, no actually the processor type. Like the 1.2 Ghz Athlon, the 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4 (HT Technology) or the 2.8 Ghz Xeon MP.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scvmm1.jpg" rel="lightbox[388]"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-390" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scvmm1-290x300.jpg" alt="Choose your CPU type within SCVMM" width="290" height="300" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">It states that it uses this info to determine the processor requirements of the virtual machine. That&#8217;s being used when calculating host ratings and when setting CPU resource allocations.<br />
You can view the host rating when you create a new virtual machine. The host rating helps you to choose the best host for your virtual machine. Based on free resources.<br />
CPU resource allocation is something we know from VMware ESX. VMware uses shares to do this. A plain number like 1000 or 2000. The virtual machine with 2000 shares gets twice the amount of CPU cycles (when needed) in comparison with the machine that has 1000 shares.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="auto;"><span style="NL;">I understand that SCVMM should use his own system that can be plotted on all the different virtualization platforms it&#8217;s going to manage (Hyper-V, XEN, ESX). But I don&#8217;t understand how a 2.4 Ghz Opteron relates to a 2.4 Ghz Xeon.<br />
So if I just want my production server to have a 50% preference over my test server which should I choose? And what&#8217;s worse, if I&#8217;m in doubt with this option, how about a self service user that&#8217;s got the option to create a new virtual machine? I can imagine it would properly mean that this user got the advise to skip it.</span></p>
<p><span style="AR-SA;">But there is one more thing confusing about this. When you use the Virtual Machine Manager snap in, there is another way to set the processor weight and you can use a simple number!</span><br />
<a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/vmm.jpg" rel="lightbox[388]"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-391" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/vmm.jpg" alt="VMM Processor Resources" width="441" height="334" /></a></p>
<p>So if I change the processor type in SCVMM of a virtual machine, you would suspect something to change within this screen. But it doesn&#8217;t&#8230; Neither does it the other way around.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to investigate some more but if you got some tips or hints, please post them!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scvmm.jpg" rel="lightbox[388]"></a><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scvmm.jpg" rel="lightbox[388]"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/07/31/scvmm-choose-your-cpu-type-wisely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing SCCM 2007 SP1/R2 in Native Mode on Windows Server 2008 (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/05/22/installing-sccm-2007-sp1r2-in-native-mode-on-windows-server-2008-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/05/22/installing-sccm-2007-sp1r2-in-native-mode-on-windows-server-2008-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 07:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nils van Schaik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Configuration Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I actually ran into more problems with the PKI after the installation. Although SCCM detects your Site Server Signing certificate during setup, the process of dragging and dropping the certificate from the current user branch to the local machine branch may (not sure if there are situations where this does not happen) corrupt the private [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually ran into more problems with the PKI after the installation. Although SCCM detects your Site Server Signing certificate during setup, the process of dragging and dropping the certificate from the current user branch to the local machine branch may (not sure if there are situations where this does not happen) corrupt the private key in the certificate. To fix this, you have to change the template for the Site Server Signing certificate. On the &#8216;Request Handling&#8217; tab, check &#8216;Allow private key to be exported&#8217;. Then go through the process of requesting the certificate as usual, and don&#8217;t drag and drop as I described in my previous post, but export from the current user certificates and import in the local machine certificates. That should fix the Site Server Signing certificate.</p>
<p>I also had a problem with the Web Server certificate, don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s related to having a Windows Server 2008 Certificate Authority or not. In the Microsoft walkthrough they tell you to duplicate the normal Web Server template. When I did this, SCCM kept reporting the Management Point giving problems; a test http request would return an error. After a little Googling I found the solution: on the new template (I named it SCCM Web Server) add Client Authentication on the &#8216;Extensions&#8217; tab. Don&#8217;t forget to re-enroll and re-assign the certificate to your website.</p>
<p>I hope that&#8217;s all I have to say about this. <img src='http://www.buit.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/05/22/installing-sccm-2007-sp1r2-in-native-mode-on-windows-server-2008-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing SCCM 2007 SP1/R2 in Native Mode on Windows Server 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/05/18/installing-sccm-2007-sp1r2-in-native-mode-on-windows-server-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/05/18/installing-sccm-2007-sp1r2-in-native-mode-on-windows-server-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 19:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nils van Schaik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Configuration Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last couple of days I&#8217;ve been playing around with the SCCM 2007 SP1/R2 beta. I wanted to try out the NAP (network access protection) features, which require Windows Server 2008 on the SCCM server. So I went ahead and created some virtual machines, a domain controller and a SCCM server. I wanted to do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last couple of days I&#8217;ve been playing around with the SCCM 2007 SP1/R2 beta. I wanted to try out the NAP (network access protection) features, which require Windows Server 2008 on the SCCM server. So I went ahead and created some virtual machines, a domain controller and a SCCM server. I wanted to do it right, so I decided to install Windows Server 2008 on the domain controller as well. To build the PKI required by native mode I followed the excellent walkthrough at <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb694035.aspx">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb694035.aspx</a>. And then I ran into trouble&#8230;..<br />
There are two issues with getting the Site Server Signing certificate on the SCCM server. First, because the CA is running on a Windows Server 2008 machine, when you duplicate the &#8216;Computer&#8217; certificate template, you get the choice which versions of Windows should support this template. Considering the fact that all servers in my environment are running Windows Server 2008, I went with that. And that was my mistake. If you select &#8220;Windows Server 2008, Enterprise Edition&#8221; the certificate template will not show up while enrolling it from the web interface, so you should select &#8220;Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition&#8221;.<br />
The second issue I ran into was related to the requesting client being a Windows Server 2008 machine. When this is the case, the web interface no longer shows the option to store the certificate in the local computer certificate store. Just continue as you normally would and after that, open an MMC on the SCCM server. Add two certificates snap-ins, one for the current user, the other for the local computer. All you have to do is drag the certificate you just enrolled from the web interface from the Personal/Certificates store under the current user branch to th Personal/Certificates store under the local computer branch.<br />
After this, in my case the SCCM installation automatically detected my certificate and installation went smoothly.</p>
<p> Please note that I have posted a follow-up to this post, because although installation will go smoothly, you will have some errors if you do it the way I descibed above. Here&#8217;s the correct way to do it:  <a href="http://www.buit.org/2008/05/22/installing-sccm-2007-sp1r2-in-native-mode-on-windows-server-2008-part-2/">http://www.buit.org/2008/05/22/installing-sccm-2007-sp1r2-in-native-mode-on-windows-server-2008-part-2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/05/18/installing-sccm-2007-sp1r2-in-native-mode-on-windows-server-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Management Summit Day 1</title>
		<link>http://www.buit.org/2008/04/30/microsoft-management-summit-day-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buit.org/2008/04/30/microsoft-management-summit-day-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Luppes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMS 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buit.org/2008/04/30/microsoft-management-summit-day-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On MMS Day 1 the keynote was opened by Bob Muglia (VP Server &#38; Tools Business) This keynote was all about Dynamic IT, the 10 year vision of Microsoft in how to operate dynamic datacenters. Currently Microsoft is in year 5 of this vision and realy showed some cool stuff in the keynote compared to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On MMS Day 1 the keynote was opened by Bob Muglia (VP Server &amp; Tools Business)</p>
<p>This keynote was all about Dynamic IT, the 10 year vision of Microsoft in how to operate dynamic datacenters. Currently Microsoft is in year 5 of this vision and realy showed some cool stuff in the keynote compared to how we managed our environments 5 years ago. I realy like the vision Microsoft is having on a Dynamic Datacenter using virtualisation, not only on the OS layer but also on the application layer.</p>
<p>In a Dynamic Datacenter all services are devided in 4 layers:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hardware
<li>Hardware Virtualisation
<li>Application Virtualisation
<li>Models</li>
</ul>
<p>The hardware layer can be managed with System Center Configuration Manager, during the keynote Microsoft did a demo on how Dynamic IT is working for server deployment. Just by using Server 2008 Server Roles en Features, a Configuration Manager Task Sequencer and a special plugin from Dell in this sequencer Microsoft was able to install a domain controller unattende on a Dell server. During this unattende installation it was possible to do the RAID settings, BIOS settings and other hardware based setting needed to roll-out the server to be compliant with the rest of the infrastructure. This way there is no need for an administrator to be present in a datacenter and still you will be able to roll out servers.</p>
<p>On the Hardware Virtualisation Layer, Microsoft did a demo of Virtual Machine Manager 2008 beta that was anounced during the keynote. A cool feature of VMM2008 is that it is able to manage VMware ESX servers, so in the near future it will be possible to manage your Virtual environment from 1 tool. This tool also supports Live migration of VMware machines. Like other Microsoft tooling VMM2008 also gives the output of the tasks you perform as an PowerShell script, so administrators that do not master PowerShell still have the abbility to automate repeating tasks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/windowslivewritermicrosoftmanagementsummitday1-b584erik-luppes-2.jpg" rel="lightbox[352]"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="244" alt="erik luppes" src="http://www.buit.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/windowslivewritermicrosoftmanagementsummitday1-b584erik-luppes-thumb.jpg" width="231" align="left" border="0"></a>Microsoft also announced the beta of SCOM Cross Platform Monitoring, that Walter described in last post.</p>
<p>So if you are interested in the slides of the Keynote on day 1 you can watch the here :</p>
<p><a href="http://fotolog.buit.org/thumbnails.php?album=7" target="_blank">Slidedeck Keynote Day 1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buit.org/2008/04/30/microsoft-management-summit-day-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

